Parent Visa Balance of Family Test: Rules, Children Counted, and Worked Examples

Last verified: 2 September 2026

The governing rule is regulation 1.05 of the Migration Regulations 1994. Current Department of Home Affairs guidance translates the legislation into a simpler practical statement: at least half the relevant children are eligible, or there are more eligible children than children in any other single country. This article separates that legal rule from the administrative guidance, explains which children count, and shows where common online summaries become misleading.

For broader orientation on Australian family migration, Australia Pathways also has a general family migration guide. Because visa rules change, current legal requirements in this dossier are sourced to Home Affairs and the Federal Register of Legislation rather than to older secondary summaries.

How the Parent Visa Balance of Family Test Works

The calculation has two independent ways to pass. You do not need to satisfy both.

In practical terms, Route 1 is the familiar “at least half” rule. Route 2 is the part most often missed. It looks not at the total overseas count, but at the largest concentration of ineligible children in a single overseas country. If eligible children outnumber that largest country group, the parent passes.

The legislation defines an eligible child as a child who is an Australian citizen, or an Australian permanent resident usually resident in Australia, or an eligible New Zealand citizen usually resident in Australia. Any other counted child is an ineligible child. Regulation 1.05 then treats an ineligible child as resident overseas for the test.

Which Parent Visas Require the Test?

Home Affairs currently lists six subclasses for which the test is required. The Sponsored Parent (Temporary) visa (subclass 870) is different: its current eligibility page expressly states that there is no balance of family test for that visa.

There is also a narrow legacy retiree concession. Home Affairs Form 47PA says qualifying retirees—people within the preserved subclass 405/410 retiree cohort described in the form—can apply for subclass 103 or 143 without meeting the Balance of Family test. That is not a general exemption for older parents; it applies only to the defined transitional retiree group.

Which Children Are Counted?

The test is broader than “how many of my biological children live in Australia?” Home Affairs states that the parent’s and partner’s children, including stepchildren and adopted children, are relevant. The legal definition in regulation 1.05 includes a child or step-child of the parent and a child or step-child of the parent’s current spouse or current de facto partner.

Home Affairs says deceased children are not counted. It also lists statutory-style exclusions for children removed from the parent’s exclusive legal custody by adoption, court order or operation of law; certain children suffering persecution or human-rights abuse where reunification is not possible in another country; and specified UNHCR-registered refugee-camp cases.

These exclusions are narrow. Estrangement, family conflict, lack of financial support, or a child’s refusal to cooperate are not listed as reasons to remove that child from the calculation. Form 47PA describes the test as objective and says the nature of the parent-child relationship is not assessed.

Residence Status Can Change the Result

For Australian permanent resident children and eligible New Zealand citizen children, “usually resident in Australia” matters. Home Affairs specifically says it does not consider children who are in Australia on a temporary visa to be usually resident in Australia for this test. Such a child is therefore not converted into an eligible child merely by being physically present in Australia.

For an ineligible child, regulation 1.05 assigns an overseas country using a sequence: the country where the child is usually resident; otherwise the last overseas country where the child was usually resident; and, if the child no longer has a right of return to that country, the child’s country of citizenship. If a child’s whereabouts are unknown, the regulation uses the child’s last known usual country of residence.

This country allocation is not administrative trivia. It directly controls Route 2 of the parent visa balance of family test because the parent is compared against the largest single overseas-country group of ineligible children.

Worked Examples: Where the Result Changes

The third example catches a common mistake. A tie with the largest overseas-country group is not enough under Route 2. The regulation requires eligible children to be greater than that group. By contrast, a tie between eligible and total ineligible children is enough under Route 1 because that limb uses “greater than or equal to”.

Law, Official Guidance, and Application Evidence

This distinction matters because online explanations sometimes collapse the rule into “half your children must live in Australia”. That shortcut is incomplete in two ways: it ignores the alternative single-country comparison, and it can misstate who is an eligible child. The safer method is to classify every relevant child under the regulation first, then do both calculations.

Common Mistakes That Can Produce the Wrong Answer

• Counting only biological children. Relevant adopted children and stepchildren can also be part of the family map.
• Ignoring a current partner’s children. The test can include children connected through the applicant’s current spouse or de facto partner.
• Removing an estranged adult child from the list. Estrangement is not one of the published exclusions.
• Treating any child physically in Australia as eligible. A temporary visa holder in Australia is not treated by Home Affairs as usually resident in Australia for this test.
• Using only the “half” formula. The single-country route can turn an apparent failure into a pass.
• Allowing a tie under the single-country route. Eligible children must be strictly greater than the largest overseas-country group.
• Assuming compassionate circumstances create a waiver. Home Affairs expressly says the test is not waived even in compelling or exceptional cases.
• Confusing the subclass 870 rule with permanent Parent visas. Subclass 870 has no balance-of-family requirement, but that does not remove the test from subclasses 103, 143, 173, 804, 864 or 884.

Transition Cases: When a Parent Is Not Re-Tested

The ordinary rules are not the whole story for applicants moving from a temporary contributory Parent visa to its corresponding permanent visa. Current Form 47PA says a holder of subclass 173 applying for subclass 143, or a holder of subclass 884 applying for subclass 864, is not re-assessed against the Balance of Family test as part of the stated transition concessions. Visa-specific Home Affairs guidance for subclass 864 likewise says a subclass 884 holder has already met the test.

This is different from a waiver. The applicant is relying on a pathway in which the test was already satisfied at the temporary contributory stage. Similarly, the legacy retiree concession is a defined transitional rule, not a discretionary decision to overlook a failed test.

What Evidence Should You Prepare?

Home Affairs can ask for evidence showing how the applicant is related to each child, each child’s citizenship or permanent-residence position, usual residence where relevant, and evidence that a child should not be included—for example, a death certificate. The exact document set depends on the facts, but the family map should be internally consistent across the visa application and supporting records.

If family circumstances are unusual—such as disputed parentage, complex adoption history, a former partner’s child, uncertain residence, loss of a right of return, or an exclusion based on persecution—the classification issue can be more important than the arithmetic. That is where professional immigration advice may be appropriate, because the outcome depends on applying legal definitions to evidence, not on a simple calculator.

Passing the Test Does Not Mean the Visa Will Be Granted Quickly

The parent visa balance of family test is one eligibility gate, not a visa approval. Parent visas also have subclass-specific sponsorship, health, character, age, Assurance of Support, location and other requirements. Home Affairs also states that the Parent visa categories covering subclasses 103, 143, 173, 804, 864 and 884 are subject to capping and queueing. Demand exceeds annual places, so passing the test does not imply a short processing period or priority.

Subclass 870 operates under a different temporary-parent framework. It avoids the Balance of Family test and Assurance of Support requirement, but it has its own sponsorship and visa criteria and does not itself grant permanent residence. That makes it an alternative temporary pathway, not a substitute test that converts an otherwise ineligible permanent Parent visa application into an eligible one.

For ongoing changes in Australian visa settings, the Australia Pathways immigration news section can be useful for orientation, but any decision involving eligibility should be checked against the current Home Affairs page and legislation in force at the time.

What to Verify Before Acting

Start with the current legal family structure, not a rough count of where your children live. Confirm who is legally a child or stepchild for the test; classify each person as eligible or ineligible; assign each ineligible child to the correct overseas country; check any exclusion against the published rule; and perform both calculations. Then confirm that the particular Parent visa subclass actually requires the test and whether a transition concession applies.

The most defensible answer to the parent visa balance of family test is therefore a documented family map plus the two regulation 1.05 comparisons. If the result is a failure, compassionate circumstances do not create a general waiver. If the result is a pass, the applicant still needs to satisfy the remaining criteria for the chosen visa subclass.

Related Australia Pathways Guides

Sources and Verification